↓ Skip to main content

Memory Impairment in HIV-Infected Individuals with Early and Late Initiation of Regular Marijuana Use

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Memory Impairment in HIV-Infected Individuals with Early and Late Initiation of Regular Marijuana Use
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10461-017-1898-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda M. Skalski, Sheri L. Towe, Kathleen J. Sikkema, Christina S. Meade

Abstract

Marijuana use is disproportionately prevalent among HIV-infected individuals. The strongest neurocognitive effect of marijuana use is impairment in the domain of memory. Memory impairment is also high among HIV-infected persons. The present study examined 69 HIV-infected individuals who were stratified by age of regular marijuana initiation to investigate how marijuana use impacts neurocognitive functioning. A comprehensive battery assessed substance use and neurocognitive functioning. Findings indicated early onset marijuana users (regular use prior to age 18), compared to non-marijuana users and late onset marijuana users (regular use at age 18 or later), were over 8 times more likely to have learning impairment and nearly 4 times more likely to have memory impairment. A similar pattern of early onset marijuana users performing worse in learning emerged when examining domain deficit scores. The potential for early onset of regular marijuana use to exacerbate already high levels of memory impairment among HIV-infected persons has important clinical implications, including increased potential for medication non-adherence and difficulty with independent living.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 20 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,388,743
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#495
of 3,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,965
of 317,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#9
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,566 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.