↓ Skip to main content

Concurrent Use of Drugs and Supplements in a Community-Dwelling Population Aged 50 Years or More: Potential Benefits and Risks

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs & Aging, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Concurrent Use of Drugs and Supplements in a Community-Dwelling Population Aged 50 Years or More: Potential Benefits and Risks
Published in
Drugs & Aging, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40266-014-0180-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jure Peklar, Martin Charles Henman, Mitja Kos, Kathryn Richardson, Rose Anne Kenny

Abstract

The use of vitamin and mineral (VMs) and non-vitamin/non-mineral supplements (non-VMs) in the general population and the older population in developed countries has increased. When combined with drugs, their use can be associated with benefit and potential risks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 15 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2014.
All research outputs
#12,900,601
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Drugs & Aging
#833
of 1,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,502
of 227,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs & Aging
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.