↓ Skip to main content

How prepared are pharmacists to support atrial fibrillation patients in adhering to newly prescribed oral anticoagulants?

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
Title
How prepared are pharmacists to support atrial fibrillation patients in adhering to newly prescribed oral anticoagulants?
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11096-017-0529-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadya Hamedi, Filipa Alves da Costa, Robert Horne, Michael Levitan, Amanda Begley, Sotiris Antoniou

Abstract

Background The New Medicines Service (NMS) was implemented in the United Kingdom in 2011 and first evaluated in 2014, showing 10% increase on adherence. Objective To assess community pharmacists' current practice, knowledge and confidence in supporting patients' adherence as part of the NMS for patients on Oral Anti-Coagulants (OACs) for stroke prevention in Atrial Fibrillation. Setting Community pharmacists in London. Method An online cross-sectional survey was sent to pharmacists from their Local Pharmaceutical Committees and advertised by the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. Analysis was undertaken in SPSs v23 considering a confidence level of 95%. Main outcome measures pharmacists reported confidence of providing the NMS on OACs; training needs and skills for supporting adherence. Results A total of 257 valid responses were analysed (6.8% response rate; {Cronbach's α = 0.676-0.892}). Data indicates that over a 2-month period, 25% of pharmacists had completed ≥6 NMS consultations for all OACs, of which 11% for new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). The key priorities in counselling items during the NMS consultation were to discuss actions to take when bleeding occurs, followed by supporting adherence. Pharmacists were more confident in their knowledge, skills and access to resources for Vitamin-K Antagonists (VKAs) than for NOACs (p < 0.005). Results also highlight pharmacists' unfamiliarity with alert cards, lower for NOACs than VKAs (p < 0.001), albeit perceived as critically important. Half the sample mentioned to use the British National Formulary as information resource. Conclusion Results suggest the provision of NMS for NOACs is low. Supporting pharmacists with tailored education and adherence support might foster dissemination.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Unspecified 5 8%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 22 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2018.
All research outputs
#14,906,275
of 24,135,931 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#789
of 1,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,305
of 319,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,135,931 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.