↓ Skip to main content

Public Health Perspectives on Aquaculture

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 323)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Public Health Perspectives on Aquaculture
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s40572-014-0018-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan G. Gormaz, Jillian P. Fry, Marcia Erazo, David C. Love

Abstract

Nearly half of all seafood consumed globally comes from aquaculture, a method of food production that has expanded rapidly in recent years. Increasing seafood consumption has been proposed as part of a strategy to combat the current non-communicable disease (NCD) pandemic, but public health, environmental, social, and production challenges related to certain types of aquaculture production must be addressed. Resolving these complicated human health and ecologic trade-offs requires systems thinking and collaboration across many fields; the One Health concept is an integrative approach that brings veterinary and human health experts together to combat zoonotic disease. We propose applying and expanding the One Health approach to facilitate collaboration among stakeholders focused on increasing consumption of seafood and expanding aquaculture production, using methods that minimize risks to public health, animal health, and ecology. This expanded application of One Health may also have relevance to other complex systems with similar trade-offs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Student > Master 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 20%
Environmental Science 20 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 10 6%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 43 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2020.
All research outputs
#623,066
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#26
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,458
of 226,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,959 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them