↓ Skip to main content

Psychological Distress in Refugee Children: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
6 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
441 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
498 Mendeley
Title
Psychological Distress in Refugee Children: A Systematic Review
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, March 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10567-010-0081-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Israel Bronstein, Paul Montgomery

Abstract

Nearly one-quarter of the refugees worldwide are children. There have been numerous studies reporting their levels of psychological distress. The aim of this paper is to review systematically and synthesize the epidemiological research concerning the mental health of refugee children residing in Western countries. A Cochrane Collaboration style review was conducted searching nine major databases, bibliographies, and grey literature from 2003 to 2008. Included studies had to meet the reporting standards of STROBE and investigate mental health in non-clinical samples of asylum seeking and refugee children residing in OECD countries. A total of twenty-two studies were identified of 4,807 retrieved citations, covering 3,003 children from over 40 countries. Studies varied in definition and measurement of problems, which included levels of post-traumatic stress disorder from 19 to 54%, depression from 3 to 30%, and varying degrees of emotional and behavioral problems. Significant factors influencing levels of distress appear to include demographic variables, cumulative traumatic pre-migration experiences, and post-migration stressors. Importantly, the research base demands greater contextual and methodological refining such that future research would have greater generalizability and clinical implications.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 498 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 4 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 489 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 106 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 14%
Student > Bachelor 58 12%
Researcher 49 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 46 9%
Other 73 15%
Unknown 98 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 171 34%
Social Sciences 85 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 1%
Other 37 7%
Unknown 123 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,191,188
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#53
of 412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,370
of 122,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.