↓ Skip to main content

Obesity and Prognosis in Chronic Diseases — Impact of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Obesity Paradox

Overview of attention for article published in Current Sports Medicine Reports, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
9 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Obesity and Prognosis in Chronic Diseases — Impact of Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Obesity Paradox
Published in
Current Sports Medicine Reports, January 2014
DOI 10.1249/jsr.0000000000000067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carl J. Lavie, Alban De Schutter, Edward Archer, Paul A. McAuley, Steven N. Blair

Abstract

The effects of overweight and obesity on chronic diseases, particularly on cardiovascular disease (CVD), and its impact on increasing CVD risk factors and total CVD are reviewed. However despite the adverse effects of obesity on CVD risk factors and CVD, obesity has a surprising association with prognosis in patients with established diseases, often showing an "obesity," where overweight (body mass index (BMI), 25 to 29.9 kg·m) and obese patients (BMI, ≥30 kg·m) with established CVD frequently have a better prognosis than that of their leaner counterparts (BMI, <25 kg·m) with the same diseases. Fitness-versus-fatness debate is summarized also, including the critical role that fitness plays to alter the relationship between adiposity and subsequent prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Sports and Recreations 3 7%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2015.
All research outputs
#6,496,106
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Current Sports Medicine Reports
#414
of 1,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,514
of 319,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Sports Medicine Reports
#19
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,390 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.