| Title |
Are women with a history of abuse more vulnerable to perinatal depressive symptoms? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Women's Mental Health, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00737-014-0440-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. Alvarez-Segura, L. Garcia-Esteve, A. Torres, A. Plaza, M. L. Imaz, L. Hermida-Barros, L. San, N. Burtchen |
| Abstract |
The objective of this paper is to examine the association between maternal lifetime abuse and perinatal depressive symptoms. Papers included in this review were identified through electronic searches of the following databases: Pubmed Medline and Ovid, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library. Each database was searched from its start date through 1 September 2011. Keywords such as "postpartum," "perinatal," "prenatal," "depression," "violence," "child abuse," and "partner abuse" were included in the purview of MeSH terms. Studies that examined the association between maternal lifetime abuse and perinatal depression were included. A total of 545 studies were included in the initial screening. Forty-three articles met criteria for inclusion and were incorporated in this review. Quality of articles was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa-Scale (NOS). This systematic review indicates a positive association between maternal lifetime abuse and depressive symptoms in the perinatal period. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 4 | 80% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 261 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 21% |
| Unknown | 69 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 69 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Unknown | 78 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,483,943
of 24,744,050 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#278
of 987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,891
of 231,205 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Women's Mental Health
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,744,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,205 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.