↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Diminished Multisensory Integration in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
119 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
Title
Evidence for Diminished Multisensory Integration in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10803-014-2179-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan A. Stevenson, Justin K. Siemann, Tiffany G. Woynaroski, Brittany C. Schneider, Haley E. Eberly, Stephen M. Camarata, Mark T. Wallace

Abstract

Individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) exhibit alterations in sensory processing, including changes in the integration of information across the different sensory modalities. In the current study, we used the sound-induced flash illusion to assess multisensory integration in children with ASD and typically-developing (TD) controls. Thirty-one children with ASD and 31 age and IQ matched TD children (average age = 12 years) were presented with simple visual (i.e., flash) and auditory (i.e., beep) stimuli of varying number. In illusory conditions, a single flash was presented with 2-4 beeps. In TD children, these conditions generally result in the perception of multiple flashes, implying a perceptual fusion across vision and audition. In the present study, children with ASD were significantly less likely to perceive the illusion relative to TD controls, suggesting that multisensory integration and cross-modal binding may be weaker in some children with ASD. These results are discussed in the context of previous findings for multisensory integration in ASD and future directions for research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 266 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 42 16%
Researcher 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 8%
Other 57 21%
Unknown 51 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 87 32%
Neuroscience 40 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 61 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,128,047
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#946
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,600
of 230,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.