↓ Skip to main content

Towards consistency, rigour and compatibility of risk assessments for ecosystems and ecological communities

Overview of attention for article published in Austral Ecology, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Towards consistency, rigour and compatibility of risk assessments for ecosystems and ecological communities
Published in
Austral Ecology, July 2014
DOI 10.1111/aec.12148
Authors

Emily Nicholson, Tracey J. Regan, Tony D. Auld, Emma L. Burns, Laurie A. Chisholm, Valerie English, Stephen Harris, Peter Harrison, Richard T. Kingsford, Michelle R. Leishman, Daniel J. Metcalfe, Phil Pisanu, Christopher J. Watson, Matthew White, Matt D. White, Richard J. Williams, Bruce Wilson, David A. Keith

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 2%
South Africa 2 2%
Ecuador 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 78 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 12 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 37 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 16 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,278,415
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Austral Ecology
#194
of 1,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,574
of 231,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Austral Ecology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.