Title |
Epilepsy mortality and risk factors for death in epilepsy: a population-based study
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2011
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp11x572463 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Leone Ridsdale, Judith Charlton, Mark Ashworth, Mark P Richardson, Martin C Gulliford |
Abstract |
Epilepsy is an important cause of amenable mortality but risk factors for death in epilepsy are not well understood. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 3 | 25% |
United States | 2 | 17% |
Canada | 2 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 102 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 21 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Other | 9 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
Other | 18 | 17% |
Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 29% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Other | 20 | 19% |
Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,522,269
of 24,527,525 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#747
of 4,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,156
of 114,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#5
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,525 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.