| Title |
Effect of juggling therapy on anxiety disorders in female patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioPsychoSocial Medicine, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1751-0759-1-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toshihiro Nakahara, Kazuhiko Nakahara, Miho Uehara, Ken-ichiro Koyama, Kouha Li, Toshiro Harada, Daisuke Yasuhara, Hikaru Taguchi, Sinya Kojima, Ken-ichiro Sagiyama, Akio Inui |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of juggling therapy for anxiety disorder patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 8 | 24% |
| United States | 6 | 18% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 16 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 97% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,287,214
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#27
of 323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,420
of 86,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioPsychoSocial Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them