You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding expertise and non-analytic cognition in fingerprint discriminations made by humans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Psychology, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00737 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew B. Thompson, Jason M. Tangen, Rachel A. Searston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 45% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,544,812
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Psychology
#9,342
of 34,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,968
of 242,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Psychology
#142
of 392 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 34,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 392 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.