| Title |
Analysis of three strategies to increase screening coverage for cervical cancer in the general population of women aged 60 to 70 years: the CRICERVA study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Women's Health, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6874-14-86 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amelia Acera, Josep Maria Manresa, Diego Rodriguez, Ana Rodriguez, Josep Maria Bonet, Norman Sanchez, Pablo Hidalgo, Pilar Soteras, Pere Toran, Marta Trapero-Bertran, Iris Lozano, Silvia De Sanjose |
| Abstract |
Cervical cancer is a frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Despite having easy preventive and therapeutic approaches, it is an important cause of mortality among women. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 136 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 33 | 23% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 51% |
| Psychology | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2014.
All research outputs
#16,017,750
of 23,775,451 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,384
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,244
of 228,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#18
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,775,451 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.