↓ Skip to main content

Comparative study of the safety of regadenoson between patients with mild/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Comparative study of the safety of regadenoson between patients with mild/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, July 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00259-013-2493-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Salgado Garcia, Amelia Jimenez Heffernan, Elena Sanchez de Mora, Carlos Ramos Font, Juana Lopez Martin, Francisco Rivera de los Santos, Ignacio Ynfante Milá

Abstract

To compare the safety of regadenoson, a selective agonist of A2A adenosine receptors, combined with low-level exercise, between subjects with mild/moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma referred for myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 27%
Researcher 7 14%
Other 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 41%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2014.
All research outputs
#21,153,429
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#2,610
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,480
of 195,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#22
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.