↓ Skip to main content

Sequential chemotherapy and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Hematology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Sequential chemotherapy and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Published in
International Journal of Hematology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s12185-011-0919-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kotaro Arita, Takeshi Kondo, Junichi Sugita, Akio Shigematsu, Souichi Shiratori, Kentaro Wakasa, Atsushi Yasumoto, Makoto Ibata, Yusuke Shono, Misato Kikuchi, Hideki Goto, Yukari Takeda, Mutsumi Takahata, Naoko Kato, Mitsufumi Nishio, Shuichi Ota, Junji Tanaka, Masahiro Imamura

Abstract

The prognosis of patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is very poor. To improve survival rates, we attempted to intensify the conditioning regimen with daunorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone, medium-dose etoposide, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (DNR/VCR/PSL plus medium-dose VP/CY/TBI). Four patients in relapse or induction failure of B-precursor ALL without other complications underwent allogeneic HSCT. Initially, chemotherapy comprising DNR 60 mg/m(2) for 3 days, VCR 1.4 mg/m(2) for 1 day, and PSL 60 mg/m(2) for 3 days was administered, which was followed by medium-dose VP/CY/TBI; some modifications were made for individual patients. All patients achieved engraftment and complete remission after HSCT. Regimen-related toxicities were tolerable and no patient died within 100 days. Two patients were alive without disease on days 563 and 1,055. The third patient relapsed on day 951, while the fourth died on day 179 without disease. Our results indicate that intensified myeloablative HSCT should be considered for patients with refractory ALL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 6 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2011.
All research outputs
#18,295,723
of 22,651,245 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Hematology
#893
of 1,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,972
of 124,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Hematology
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,651,245 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,384 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.