↓ Skip to main content

The reproducibility of self-reported age at menarche: The Tromsø Study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
The reproducibility of self-reported age at menarche: The Tromsø Study
Published in
BMC Women's Health, August 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12905-017-0420-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Wasmuth Lundblad, Bjarne K. Jacobsen

Abstract

Previous studies of the reproducibility of self-reported age at menarche have been limited because of small study samples, short follow-up and the limited age span of the women included. The present study assessed the reproducibility of age at menarche in 6731 women with a wide variation of age when giving the information about age at menarche. The women reported age at menarche in a self-administered questionnaire, both in 1986-1987 and 1994-1995. They were all residents of Tromsø, Norway, and aged 25-73 in 1994-1995. In order to investigate the agreement between self-reported age at menarche at the two points in time, Pearson's correlation coefficient was applied to assess the linear correlation between the reported menarcheal age at the two occasions. Analyses were stratified for age. A Bland-Altman plot was produced and limits of agreement computed. We found a high correlation and a strong agreement between self-reported age at menarche in 1986-1987 and 1994-1995. The overall Pearson's correlation coefficient was 0.84 and was not attenuated by increasing age of the women. The Bland-Altman plot showed a strong agreement in self-reported age at menarche. The mean difference between self-reported age at menarche was 0.01 years with limits of agreement -1.52 to 1.54. We found high reproducibility of self-reported age at menarche. The mean menarcheal age in the two surveys was identical (13.2 years) with 95% of the women reporting the same age at menarche or with a difference of 1 year. Only 0.7% of the women reported age at menarche with a difference of more than 2 years in 1986-1987 and 1994-1995.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 38%
Arts and Humanities 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 43%