↓ Skip to main content

Case mix classification and a benchmark set for surgery scheduling

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scheduling, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Case mix classification and a benchmark set for surgery scheduling
Published in
Journal of Scheduling, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10951-017-0539-8
Authors

Gréanne Leeftink, Erwin W. Hans

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 61 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 12 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 15%
Decision Sciences 4 7%
Computer Science 3 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 26 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,478,452
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#70
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,077
of 315,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them