↓ Skip to main content

Iron in Chronic Brain Disorders: Imaging and Neurotherapeutic Implications

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, July 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
252 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Iron in Chronic Brain Disorders: Imaging and Neurotherapeutic Implications
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, July 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.nurt.2007.05.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Stankiewicz, S. Scott Panter, Mohit Neema, Ashish Arora, Courtney E. Batt, Rohit Bakshi

Abstract

Iron is important for brain oxygen transport, electron transfer, neurotransmitter synthesis, and myelin production. Though iron deposition has been observed in the brain with normal aging, increased iron has also been shown in many chronic neurological disorders including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and multiple sclerosis. In vitro studies have demonstrated that excessive iron can lead to free radical production, which can promote neurotoxicity. However, the link between observed iron deposition and pathological processes underlying various diseases of the brain is not well understood. It is not known whether excessive in vivo iron directly contributes to tissue damage or is solely an epiphenomenon. In this article, we focus on the imaging of brain iron and the underlying physiology and metabolism relating to iron deposition. We conclude with a discussion of the potential implications of iron-related toxicity to neurotherapeutic development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 3 1%
Austria 2 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Jordan 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 227 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 20%
Researcher 46 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 7%
Other 51 21%
Unknown 33 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 12%
Neuroscience 28 11%
Engineering 16 7%
Physics and Astronomy 14 6%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 46 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#1,053
of 1,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,373
of 78,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#10
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,308 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 78,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.