Title |
Erratum to: Estimated Healthcare Costs of Melanoma in Australia Over 3 Years Post-Diagnosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s40258-017-0347-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thomas M. Elliott, David C. Whiteman, Catherine M. Olsen, Louisa G. Gordon |
Abstract |
The last word in the first paragraph which previously read AU$25 million should read 25 million as this relates to population size. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 29% |
Unspecified | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,028,118
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#310
of 784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,466
of 315,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.