↓ Skip to main content

The association between previous success with weight loss through dietary change and success in a lifestyle modification program

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 1,078)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
The association between previous success with weight loss through dietary change and success in a lifestyle modification program
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10865-017-9883-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephanie G. Kerrigan, Margaret Clark, Alexandra Convertino, Evan M. Forman, Meghan L. Butryn

Abstract

Prior work has yielded mixed results regarding the association between previous weight loss and success in a current weight loss attempt. The present study evaluated differences in baseline psychosocial processes, changes in these over time, and weight loss during a yearlong behavioral weight loss program between individuals who have and have not previously been successful losing weight through self-regulating dietary intake. Individuals with prior success had greater weight losses over time than those without. Differences in baseline and change over time in some facets of motivation and self-efficacy were observed, but only differences in attendance accounted for differential weight loss. Prior success with dietary self-regulation may predict better adherence to and success in behavioral weight control programs. Evaluating the type of weight control efforts that have previously helped induce weight losses may help to better match individuals to treatments likely to yield success.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 22%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 2 4%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2017.
All research outputs
#313,656
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#28
of 1,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,524
of 316,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.