↓ Skip to main content

Burnout intervention studies for inpatient elderly care nursing staff: Systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nursing Studies, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Burnout intervention studies for inpatient elderly care nursing staff: Systematic literature review
Published in
International Journal of Nursing Studies, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2012.12.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Westermann, Agnessa Kozak, Melanie Harling, Albert Nienhaus

Abstract

Staff providing inpatient elderly and geriatric long-term care are exposed to a large number of factors that can lead to the development of burnout syndrome. Burnout is associated with an increased risk of absence from work, low work satisfaction, and an increased intention to leave. Due to the fact that the number of geriatric nursing staff is already insufficient, research on interventions aimed at reducing work-related stress in inpatient elderly care is needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Unknown 343 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 16%
Student > Bachelor 44 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 10%
Researcher 27 8%
Other 72 20%
Unknown 78 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 75 21%
Psychology 69 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 13%
Social Sciences 21 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 4%
Other 40 11%
Unknown 89 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,669,190
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nursing Studies
#222
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,799
of 288,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nursing Studies
#3
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,792 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.