↓ Skip to main content

Determination of methylisothiocyanate in soil and water by HS-SPME followed by GC–MS–MS with a triple quadrupole

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Determination of methylisothiocyanate in soil and water by HS-SPME followed by GC–MS–MS with a triple quadrupole
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, June 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00216-014-7960-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aranzazu Peruga, Joaquim Beltrán, Francisco López, Félix Hernández

Abstract

Methylisothiocyanate (MITC) is the main degradation product of metam sodium, a soil disinfectant widely used in agriculture, and is responsible for its disinfectant properties. Because MITC is highly toxic and volatile, metam sodium has to be applied in a manner that tries to reduce atmospheric emissions but still maintains adequate concentration of MITC in soil to ensure its disinfectant effect. Thus, monitoring of MITC concentrations in soil is required, and to this end sensitive, fast, and reliable analytical methods must be developed. In this work, a headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) method was developed for MITC determination in water and soil samples using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS-MS) with a triple-quadrupole analyzer. Two MS-MS transitions were acquired to ensure the reliable quantification and confirmation of the analyte. The method had linear behavior in the range tested (0.026-2.6 ng mL(-1) in water, 1-100 ng g(-1) in soil) with r (2) over 0.999. Detection limits were 0.017 ng mL(-1) and 0.1 ng g(-1) in water and soil, respectively. Recoveries for five replicates were in the range 76-92 %, and RSD was below 7 % at the two spiking levels tested for each matrix (0.1 and 1 ng mL(-1) for water, 4 and 40 ng g(-1) for soil). The potential of using multiple HS-SPME for analyzing soil samples was also investigated, and its feasibility for quantification of MITC evaluated. The developed HS-SPME method was applied to soil samples from experimental plots treated with metam sodium following good agriculture practices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kazakhstan 1 2%
France 1 2%
Unknown 41 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 21%
Researcher 7 16%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 9 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 22 51%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#1,858
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,454
of 242,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#26
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,707 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.