↓ Skip to main content

A hole-conductor–free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability

Overview of attention for article published in Science, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
18 X users
patent
27 patents
weibo
2 weibo users
googleplus
5 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2710 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A hole-conductor–free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability
Published in
Science, July 2014
DOI 10.1126/science.1254763
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anyi Mei, Xiong Li, Linfeng Liu, Zhiliang Ku, Tongfa Liu, Yaoguang Rong, Mi Xu, Min Hu, Jiangzhao Chen, Ying Yang, Michael Grätzel, Hongwei Han

Abstract

We fabricated a perovskite solar cell that uses a double layer of mesoporous TiO2 and ZrO2 as a scaffold infiltrated with perovskite and does not require a hole-conducting layer. The perovskite was produced by drop-casting a solution of PbI2, methylammonium (MA) iodide, and 5-ammoniumvaleric acid (5-AVA) iodide through a porous carbon film. The 5-AVA templating created mixed-cation perovskite (5-AVA)x(MA)1- xPbI3 crystals with lower defect concentration and better pore filling as well as more complete contact with the TiO2 scaffold, resulting in a longer exciton lifetime and a higher quantum yield for photoinduced charge separation as compared to MAPbI3. The cell achieved a certified power conversion efficiency of 12.8% and was stable for >1000 hours in ambient air under full sunlight.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 <1%
United Kingdom 9 <1%
Belgium 6 <1%
Japan 5 <1%
Germany 5 <1%
Korea, Republic of 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 20 <1%
Unknown 2038 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 592 28%
Researcher 324 15%
Student > Master 283 13%
Student > Bachelor 151 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 103 5%
Other 297 14%
Unknown 360 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 481 23%
Chemistry 384 18%
Physics and Astronomy 299 14%
Engineering 260 12%
Energy 115 5%
Other 113 5%
Unknown 458 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#374,221
of 24,464,848 outputs
Outputs from Science
#9,451
of 79,781 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,300
of 233,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#108
of 895 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,464,848 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,781 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 64.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 895 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.