↓ Skip to main content

Bilateral Clubfeet Are Highly Correlated: A Cautionary Tale for Researchers

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Bilateral Clubfeet Are Highly Correlated: A Cautionary Tale for Researchers
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11999-014-3776-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelly Gray, Paul Gibbons, David Little, Joshua Burns

Abstract

Congenital talipes equinovarus, or clubfoot, is a common pediatric orthopaedic condition of unknown origin. In many clubfoot clinical trials, interventions are assigned to a patient, but response to treatment is assessed separately in each foot. Trials commonly report x patients with y feet where y is greater than x (eg, 35 patients with 56 feet). However, common statistical tests assume that each data point is independent. Although data from unilateral cases of clubfoot are independent, it is unknown if each foot of patients with bilateral clubfeet are correlated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 26%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 8 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Chemistry 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,237,349
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,693
of 7,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,207
of 242,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#72
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.