Title |
Bilateral Clubfeet Are Highly Correlated: A Cautionary Tale for Researchers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11999-014-3776-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kelly Gray, Paul Gibbons, David Little, Joshua Burns |
Abstract |
Congenital talipes equinovarus, or clubfoot, is a common pediatric orthopaedic condition of unknown origin. In many clubfoot clinical trials, interventions are assigned to a patient, but response to treatment is assessed separately in each foot. Trials commonly report x patients with y feet where y is greater than x (eg, 35 patients with 56 feet). However, common statistical tests assume that each data point is independent. Although data from unilateral cases of clubfoot are independent, it is unknown if each foot of patients with bilateral clubfeet are correlated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 67% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 26% |
Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 10% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Chemistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,237,349
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#4,693
of 7,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,207
of 242,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#72
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.