↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial to s tu dy the effect of vitamin D supplemen tation on gly caemic control in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus SUNNY trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Endocrine Disorders, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
Study protocol: a randomised placebo-controlled clinical trial to s tu dy the effect of vitamin D supplemen tation on gly caemic control in type 2 Diabetes Mellitus SUNNY trial
Published in
BMC Endocrine Disorders, July 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6823-14-59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne HM Krul-Poel, Hans van Wijland, Frank Stam, Edwin ten Boekel, Paul Lips, Suat Simsek

Abstract

Besides the classical role of vitamin D on calcium and bone homeostasis, vitamin D deficiency has recently been identified as a contributing factor in the onset of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, it is uncertain whether vitamin D deficiency and poor glycaemic control are causally interrelated or that they constitute two independent features of type 2 diabetes mellitus. There are limited clinical trials carried out which measured the effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic control.The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on glycaemic control and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 19%
Student > Bachelor 27 19%
Student > Postgraduate 13 9%
Researcher 12 8%
Other 7 5%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 32 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 36 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2014.
All research outputs
#18,375,064
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#494
of 745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,417
of 204,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#13
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.