| Title |
A procedure to simulate coronary artery bypass graft surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, August 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11517-007-0201-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fernando Cacho, Manuel Doblaré, Gerhard A. Holzapfel |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 27% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 16% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 29 | 57% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2020.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#167
of 2,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,070
of 76,109 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,053 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,109 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.