| Title |
Catheter-based septalablation for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy:
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00392-005-0256-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Faber, H. Seggewiss, F. H. Gietzen, H. Kuhn, P. Boekstegers, L. Neuhaus†, L. Seipel, D. Horstkotte |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Librarian | 1 | 7% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 50% |
| Psychology | 1 | 7% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2011.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#415
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,590
of 68,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.