| Title |
Lack of Bioequivalence between Different Formulations of Isosorbide Dinitrate and Hydralazine and the Fixed-Dose Combination of Isosorbide Dinitrate/Hydralazine
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2165/00003088-200746100-00006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. William Tam, Michael L. Sabolinski, Manuel Worcel, Milton Packer, Jay N. Cohn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 36% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#682
of 1,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,303
of 191,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#288
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.