↓ Skip to main content

A Neuron-Specific Gene Therapy Relieves Motor Deficits in Pompe Disease Mice

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
A Neuron-Specific Gene Therapy Relieves Motor Deficits in Pompe Disease Mice
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s12035-017-0763-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ni-Chung Lee, Wuh-Liang Hwu, Shin-Ichi Muramatsu, Darin J. Falk, Barry J. Byrne, Chia-Hao Cheng, Nien-Chu Shih, Kai-Ling Chang, Li-Kai Tsai, Yin-Hsiu Chien

Abstract

In Pompe disease, deficient lysosomal acid α-glucosidase (GAA) activity causes glycogen accumulation in the muscles, which leads to weakness, cardiomyopathy, and respiratory failure. Although glycogen accumulation also occurs in the nervous system, the burden of neurological deficits in Pompe disease remains obscure. In this study, a neuron-specific gene therapy was administered to Pompe mice through intracerebroventricular injection of a viral vector carrying a neuron-specific promoter. The results revealed that gene therapy increased GAA activity and decreased glycogen content in the brain and spinal cord but not in the muscles of Pompe mice. Gene therapy only slightly increased the muscle strength of Pompe mice but substantially improved their performance on the rotarod, a test measuring motor coordination. Gene therapy also decreased astrogliosis and increased myelination in the brain and spinal cord of Pompe mice. Therefore, a neuron-specific treatment improved the motor coordination of Pompe mice by lowering glycogen accumulation, decreasing astrogliosis, and increasing myelination. These findings indicate that neurological deficits are responsible for a significant burden in Pompe disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 28%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#6,895,888
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#1,309
of 3,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,470
of 319,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#11
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.