| Title |
Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2007
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelvin Jordan, Alexandra M Clarke, Deborah P M Symmons, Douglas Fleming, Mark Porcheret, Umesh T Kadam, Peter Croft |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 143 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 17% |
| Researcher | 24 | 16% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,755,994
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,341
of 4,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,784
of 168,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.