↓ Skip to main content

Clinical impact of PSMA-based 18F–DCFBC PET/CT imaging in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after primary local therapy

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
Title
Clinical impact of PSMA-based 18F–DCFBC PET/CT imaging in patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer after primary local therapy
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00259-017-3818-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther Mena, Maria L. Lindenberg, Joanna H. Shih, Stephen Adler, Stephanie Harmon, Ethan Bergvall, Deborah Citrin, William Dahut, Anita T. Ton, Yolanda McKinney, Juanita Weaver, Philip Eclarinal, Alicia Forest, George Afari, Sibaprasad Bhattacharyya, Ronnie C. Mease, Maria J. Merino, Peter Pinto, Bradford J. Wood, Paula Jacobs, Martin G. Pomper, Peter L. Choyke, Baris Turkbey

Abstract

The purpose of our study was to assess (18)F-DCFBC PET/CT, a PSMA targeted PET agent, for lesion detection and clinical management of biochemical relapse in prostate cancer patients after primary treatment. This is a prospective IRB-approved study of 68 patients with documented biochemical recurrence after primary local therapy consisting of radical prostatectomy (n = 50), post radiation therapy (n = 9) or both (n = 9), with negative conventional imaging. All 68 patients underwent whole-body (18)F-DCFBC PET/CT, and 62 also underwent mpMRI within one month. Lesion detection with (18)F-DCFBC was correlated with mpMRI findings and pre-scan PSA levels. The impact of (18)F-DCFBC PET/CT on clinical management and treatment decisions was established after 6 months' patient clinical follow-up. Forty-one patients (60.3%) showed at least one positive (18)F-DCFBC lesion, for a total of 79 lesions, 30 in the prostate bed, 39 in lymph nodes, and ten in distant sites. Tumor recurrence was confirmed by either biopsy (13/41 pts), serial CT/MRI (8/41) or clinical follow-up (15/41); there was no confirmation in five patients, who continue to be observed. The (18)F-DCFBC and mpMRI findings were concordant in 39 lesions (49.4%), and discordant in 40 lesions (50.6%); the majority (n = 32/40) of the latter occurring because the recurrence was located outside the mpMRI field of view. (18)F-DCFBC PET positivity rates correlated with PSA values and 15%, 46%, 83%, and 77% were seen in patients with PSA values <0.5, 0.5 to <1.0, 1.0 to <2.0, and ≥2.0 ng/mL, respectively. The optimal cut-off PSA value to predict a positive (18)F-DCFBC scan was 0.78 ng/mL (AUC = 0.764). A change in clinical management occurred in 51.2% (21/41) of patients with a positive (18)F-DCFBC result, generally characterized by starting a new treatment in 19 patients or changing the treatment plan in two patients. (18)F-DCFBC detects recurrences in 60.3% of a population of patients with biochemical recurrence, but results are dependent on PSA levels. Above a threshold PSA value of 0.78 ng/mL, (18)F-DCFBC was able to identify recurrence with high reliability. Positive (18)F-DCFBC PET imaging led clinicians to change treatment strategy in 51.2% of patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 11 15%
Unspecified 10 14%
Other 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 33%
Unspecified 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#4,968,506
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#596
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,633
of 317,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.