↓ Skip to main content

Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery…

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00464-014-3698-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

George Melich, Young Ki Hong, Jieun Kim, Hyuk Hur, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, A. Sender Liberman, Byung Soh Min

Abstract

Laparoscopy offers some evidence of benefit compared to open rectal surgery. Robotic rectal surgery is evolving into an accepted approach. The objective was to analyze and compare laparoscopic and robotic rectal surgery learning curves with respect to operative times and perioperative outcomes for a novice minimally invasive colorectal surgeon.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 13%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 18 23%
Unknown 22 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 43%
Engineering 7 9%
Unspecified 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 27 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,303,056
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,786
of 6,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,758
of 204,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#103
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,022 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.