↓ Skip to main content

高校美術.私のカリキュラム : 青年期の表現、実践と問題 (美術教育の授業実践とその問題点に関する研究論文)

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal for the Association of Art Education, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
高校美術.私のカリキュラム : 青年期の表現、実践と問題 (美術教育の授業実践とその問題点に関する研究論文)
Published in
The Journal for the Association of Art Education, June 2017
DOI 10.24455/aaej.11.0_137
Authors

賀川 忠

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,156,425
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Journal for the Association of Art Education
#5
of 50 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,524
of 332,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal for the Association of Art Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 50 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 45 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,730 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them