↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Therapeutic Horseback Riding on Social Functioning in Children with Autism

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
299 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
725 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
The Effect of Therapeutic Horseback Riding on Social Functioning in Children with Autism
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, April 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10803-009-0734-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret M. Bass, Catherine A. Duchowny, Maria M. Llabre

Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of therapeutic horseback riding on social functioning in children with autism. We hypothesized that participants in the experimental condition (n = 19), compared to those on the wait-list control (n = 15), would demonstrate significant improvement in social functioning following a 12-weeks horseback riding intervention. Autistic children exposed to therapeutic horseback riding exhibited greater sensory seeking, sensory sensitivity, social motivation, and less inattention, distractibility, and sedentary behaviors. The results provide evidence that therapeutic horseback riding may be a viable therapeutic option in treating children with autism spectrum disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 725 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 708 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 171 24%
Student > Master 132 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 7%
Researcher 42 6%
Other 115 16%
Unknown 152 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 166 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 97 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 77 11%
Social Sciences 63 9%
Sports and Recreations 45 6%
Other 109 15%
Unknown 168 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,263,650
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#496
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,366
of 96,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.