↓ Skip to main content

Genetic variation in the G72 gene is associated with increased frontotemporal fiber tract integrity

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Genetic variation in the G72 gene is associated with increased frontotemporal fiber tract integrity
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00406-014-0516-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Nickl-Jockschat, Tony Stöcker, Axel Krug, Valentin Markov, Ivan I. Maximov, Ruiwang Huang, Frank Schneider, Ute Habel, Simon B. Eickhoff, Klaus Zerres, Markus M. Nöthen, Marcella Rietschel, N. Jon Shah, Jens Treutlein, Tilo Kircher

Abstract

G72 (syn. DAOA, D-amino acid oxidase activator) is a susceptibility gene for both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Diffusion tensor imaging studies hint at changes in fiber tract integrity in both disorders. We aimed to investigate whether a G72 susceptibility haplotype causes changes in fiber tract integrity in young healthy subjects. We compared fractional anisotropy in 47 subjects that were either homozygous for the M23/M24 risk haplotype (n = 20) or homozygous for M23(rs3918342)/M24(rs1421292) wild type (n = 27) using diffusion tensor imaging with 3 T. Tract-based spatial statistics, a method especially developed for diffusion data analysis, was used to delineate the major fiber tracts. We found clusters of increased FA values in homozygous risk haplotype carriers in the right periinsular region and in the right inferior parietal lobe (IPL). We did not find clusters indicating decreased FA values. The insula and the IPL have been implicated in both schizophrenia and bipolar pathophysiology. Increased FA values might reflect changes in dendritic morphology as previously described by in vitro studies. These findings further corroborate the hypothesis that a shared gene pool between schizophrenia and bipolar disorder might lead to neuroanatomic changes that confer an unspecific vulnerability for both disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Master 4 9%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 7 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 21 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2015.
All research outputs
#19,221,261
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#987
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,322
of 205,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#9
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.