↓ Skip to main content

Cultural specificity versus institutional universalism: a critique of the National Integrity System (NIS) methodology

Overview of attention for article published in Crime, Law and Social Change, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Cultural specificity versus institutional universalism: a critique of the National Integrity System (NIS) methodology
Published in
Crime, Law and Social Change, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10611-017-9709-z
Authors

Paul M. Heywood, Elizabeth Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 19%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 4 25%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 25%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#17,004,331
of 24,995,564 outputs
Outputs from Crime, Law and Social Change
#486
of 748 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,233
of 321,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crime, Law and Social Change
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,995,564 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 748 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.