Title |
Natale et. al.'s response to Stecco's fascial nomenclature editorial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Bodywork & Movement Therapies, July 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.06.006 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
G. Natale, S. Condino, P. Soldani, F. Fornai, M. Mattioli Belmonte, M. Gesi |
Abstract |
Despite their importance in anatomy, physiology, pathology and surgery, the fasciae and the fascial spaces have been poorly described in classic textbooks. This little attention depends on the fact that these fasciae vary in thickness and composition, especially at the cervical level. Indeed, in the main literature they have been described in different forms. Furthermore, the definition itself of the fascia is not consistent in a variety of authors. As a consequence, different criteria have been used to define and classify the fascial systems. In this paper, a brief terminological history and the most common nomenclatures and classifications of the fascia have been summarized. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 27% |
Researcher | 4 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Professor | 3 | 14% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 27% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Chemistry | 1 | 5% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |