↓ Skip to main content

Unintended Pregnancy, Induced Abortion, and Mental Health

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 1,288)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
78 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
Title
Unintended Pregnancy, Induced Abortion, and Mental Health
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11920-017-0832-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah Horvath, Courtney A. Schreiber

Abstract

The early medical literature on mental health outcomes following abortion is fraught with methodological flaws that can improperly influence clinical practice. Our goal is to review the current medical literature on depression and other mental health outcomes for women obtaining abortions. The Turnaway Study prospectively enrolled 956 women seeking abortion in the USA and followed their mental health outcomes for 5 years. The control group was comprised of women denied abortions based on gestational age limits, thereby circumventing the major methodological flaw that had plagued earlier studies on the topic. Rates of depression are not significantly different between women obtaining abortion and those denied abortion. Rates of anxiety are initially higher in women denied abortion care. Counseling on decision-making for women with unintended pregnancies should reflect these findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Master 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 9%
Researcher 9 5%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 70 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 10%
Psychology 15 9%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 75 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 139. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2023.
All research outputs
#305,156
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#48
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,379
of 324,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.