↓ Skip to main content

Oxidative Damage and Genetic Toxicity Induced by DBP in Earthworms (Eisenia fetida)

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Oxidative Damage and Genetic Toxicity Induced by DBP in Earthworms (Eisenia fetida)
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00244-017-0451-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guanying Wang, Jun Wang, Lusheng Zhu, Jinhua Wang, Hengzhou Li, Yizhang Zhang, Wenjun Liu, Jianpeng Gao

Abstract

Di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) is one of the most ubiquitous plasticizers used worldwide. However, it has negatives effects on the soil, water, atmosphere, and other environmental media and can cause serious pollution. According to the artificial soil test and previous studies, this study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity of earthworms induced by DBP at different concentrations (0, 0.1, 1.0, 10, and 50 mg kg(-1)) on the 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days of exposure. The variations in the antioxidant activities of enzymes, such as catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST), in the amounts of malondialdehyde (MDA) and reactive oxygen species (ROS) and in the amount of DNA damage were measured to evaluate the toxic impact of DBP in earthworms. Upon exposure to DBP, the SOD, CAT, POD, and GST activities were significantly increased, with the exception of the 0.1 mg kg(-1) treatment dose. High concentrations of DBP (10 and 50 mg kg(-1)) induced superfluous ROS to be produced and caused the MDA content to increase significantly. Therefore, we proposed that DBP led to DNA damage in earthworm coelomocytes in a dose-dependent manner, which means that DBP is a source of oxidative damage and genetic toxicity in earthworms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 13 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 16 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#21,153,429
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1,720
of 2,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,172
of 317,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#18
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.