↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian Methods for Quantifying and Reducing Uncertainty and Error in Forest Models

Overview of attention for article published in Current Forestry Reports, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Bayesian Methods for Quantifying and Reducing Uncertainty and Error in Forest Models
Published in
Current Forestry Reports, September 2017
DOI 10.1007/s40725-017-0069-9
Authors

Marcel van Oijen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 22%
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Master 6 9%
Other 11 16%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 28%
Environmental Science 12 18%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 7 10%
Engineering 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Current Forestry Reports
#140
of 142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,774
of 327,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Forestry Reports
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.