↓ Skip to main content

Left atrial functional reservoir: predictive value for outcome of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Left atrial functional reservoir: predictive value for outcome of catheter ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10554-014-0491-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hwan-Cheol Park, Yonggu Lee, DaeIn Lee, Yae Min Park, Jaemin Shim, Ji-Eun Ban, Jong-Il Choi, Sang-Weon Park, Young-Hoon Kim

Abstract

Left arial (LA) function, defined according to conduit, reservoir and booster functions, is closely linked to left ventricular (LV) mechanics, particularly during diastole. Right ventricular pacing (RVP) is thought to impair LA diastolic restoring forces through alteration of ventricular activation. The aim of this study was to determine whether the LA functional reservoir estimated as the change in mean LA ejection fraction (EF) immediately after RVP, and for the second and for the third beats after RVP, predicts clinical outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) who have undergone catheter ablation (CA). Data from 155 patients with paroxysmal AF (56.0 ± 10.6 years, M:F = 114:41) were analyzed. All patients underwent LA angiography during RVP. LA EFs were measured at the immediate first (LA EF1), second (LA EF2) and third beats (LA EF3) after RVP, using a right anterior oblique 30° view. During follow-up, AF recurred in 35 patients (22.6 %). Mean LA EF1 was 37.9 ± .8 % in the AF recurrence group and 48.0 ± 8.6 % in the non-recurrence group (P < 0.001). Mean LA EF2 and LA EF3 were also lower in the AF recurrence group than in the non-recurrence group (P < 0.001, respectively). Mean percent changes from LA EF2 to LA EF3 were -0.4 ± 3.4 in the AF recurrence group and 5.2 ± 4.9 in the non-recurrence group (P = 0.041). The change in mean EF from LA EF1 to LA EF3 in the non-recurrence group was significantly greater than in the recurrence group (P = 0.001). Cox regression analysis showed that predictors of AF recurrence were LA EF2, LA EF3 and accompanied obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (P < 0.001, respectively). Decreased functional LA reservoir (LA EF after RVP) and OSA are significantly related to recurrence of AF following CA in patients with paroxysmal AF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 29%
Other 2 10%
Professor 2 10%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Unknown 7 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2014.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,460
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#205,834
of 239,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#24
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,784 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.