↓ Skip to main content

A search advantage for faces learned in motion

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, December 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
A search advantage for faces learned in motion
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, December 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00221-005-0283-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin S. Pilz, Ian M. Thornton, Heinrich H. Bülthoff

Abstract

Recently there has been growing interest in the role that motion might play in the perception and representation of facial identity. Most studies have considered old/new recognition as a task. However, especially for non-rigid motion, these studies have often produced contradictory results. Here, we used a delayed visual search paradigm to explore how learning is affected by non-rigid facial motion. In the current studies we trained observers on two frontal view faces, one moving non-rigidly, the other a static picture. After a delay, observers were asked to identify the targets in static search arrays containing 2, 4 or 6 faces. On a given trial target and distractor faces could be shown in one of five viewpoints, frontal, 22 degrees or 45 degrees to the left or right. We found that familiarizing observers with dynamic faces led to a constant reaction time advantage across all setsizes and viewpoints compared to static familiarization. This suggests that non-rigid motion affects identity decisions even across extended periods of time and changes in viewpoint. Furthermore, it seems as if such effects may be difficult to observe using more traditional old/new recognition tasks.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
United Kingdom 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
Unknown 75 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 9 10%
Professor 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 8 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 51 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Engineering 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 11 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2010.
All research outputs
#20,233,066
of 22,758,963 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#2,906
of 3,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,906
of 146,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#25
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,758,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.