↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of surficial CO2 efflux to other measures of subsurface crude oil degradation

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of surficial CO2 efflux to other measures of subsurface crude oil degradation
Published in
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, June 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jconhyd.2014.06.006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ean Warren, Natasha J. Sihota, Frances D. Hostettler, Barbara A. Bekins

Abstract

At a spill site near Bemidji, Minnesota, crude oil at the water table has been undergoing anaerobic biodegradation for over 30years. Previous work at this site has shown that methane produced from biodegradation of the oil migrates upward and is oxidized in a methanotrophic zone midway between the water table and the surface. To compare microbial activity measurement methods from multiple locations in the oil body, surficial carbon dioxide efflux, methanogen and methanotroph concentrations, and oil degradation state were collected. Carbon dioxide effluxes over the oil body averaged more than four times those at the background site. Methanotrophic bacteria concentrations measured using pmoA were over 10(5) times higher above the oil-contaminated sediments compared with the background site. Methanogenic archaea measured using mcrA ranged from 10(5) to over 10(7) in the oil and were below detection in the background. Methanogens correlated very well with methanotroph concentrations (r=0.99), n-alkylcyclohexane losses as a proxy for degradation state (r=-0.96), and somewhat less well with carbon dioxide efflux (r=0.92). Carbon dioxide efflux similarly correlated to methanotroph concentrations (r=0.90) and n-alkylcyclohexane losses (r=-0.91).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 38%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 31%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 23%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Energy 1 4%
Chemistry 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 31%