↓ Skip to main content

Analysis of potential protein-modifying variants in 9000 endometriosis patients and 150000 controls of European ancestry

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Analysis of potential protein-modifying variants in 9000 endometriosis patients and 150000 controls of European ancestry
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-10440-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yadav Sapkota, Immaculata De Vivo, Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir, Amelie Fassbender, Lisa Bowdler, Julie E. Buring, Todd L. Edwards, Sarah Jones, Dorien O, Daniëlle Peterse, Kathryn M. Rexrode, Paul M. Ridker, Andrew J. Schork, Gudmar Thorleifsson, Leanne M. Wallace, iPSYCH-SSI-Broad Group, Peter Kraft, Andrew P. Morris, Dale R. Nyholt, Digna R. Velez Edwards, Mette Nyegaard, Thomas D’Hooghe, Daniel I. Chasman, Kari Stefansson, Stacey A. Missmer, Grant W. Montgomery

Abstract

Genome-wide association (GWA) studies have identified 19 independent common risk loci for endometriosis. Most of the GWA variants are non-coding and the genes responsible for the association signals have not been identified. Herein, we aimed to assess the potential role of protein-modifying variants in endometriosis using exome-array genotyping in 7164 cases and 21005 controls, and a replication set of 1840 cases and 129016 controls of European ancestry. Results in the discovery sample identified significant evidence for association with coding variants in single-variant (rs1801232-CUBN) and gene-level (CIITA and PARP4) meta-analyses, but these did not survive replication. In the combined analysis, there was genome-wide significant evidence for rs13394619 (P = 2.3 × 10(-9)) in GREB1 at 2p25.1 - a locus previously identified in a GWA meta-analysis of European and Japanese samples. Despite sufficient power, our results did not identify any protein-modifying variants (MAF > 0.01) with moderate or large effect sizes in endometriosis, although these variants may exist in non-European populations or in high-risk families. The results suggest continued discovery efforts should focus on genotyping large numbers of surgically-confirmed endometriosis cases and controls, and/or sequencing high-risk families to identify novel rare variants to provide greater insights into the molecular pathogenesis of the disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 11 30%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Philosophy 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 6 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2019.
All research outputs
#14,364,802
of 23,002,898 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#68,117
of 124,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,753
of 316,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,864
of 5,548 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,002,898 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,004 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,548 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.