↓ Skip to main content

A clinical analysis of gelatin allergy and determination of its causal relationship to the previous administration of gelatin-containing acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and…

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
24 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
18 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A clinical analysis of gelatin allergy and determination of its causal relationship to the previous administration of gelatin-containing acellular pertussis vaccine combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids
Published in
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, February 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70508-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tetsuo Nakayama, Chikara Aizawa, Harumi Kuno-Sakai

Abstract

The number of patients with allergic reactions after administration of gelatin-containing live vaccines is increasingly reported in Japan. These allergic reactions appear to be caused by gelatin allergy. It is still unknown how the patients were sensitized to gelatin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 19%
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,161,437
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#957
of 11,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,016
of 102,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#2
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.