| Title |
Cancer survivors’ self-efficacy to self-manage in the year following primary treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11764-014-0384-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Foster, M. Breckons, P. Cotterell, D. Barbosa, L. Calman, J. Corner, D. Fenlon, R. Foster, C. Grimmett, A. Richardson, P. W. Smith |
| Abstract |
Cancer survivors are increasingly expected to manage the consequences of cancer and its treatment for themselves. There is evidence that self-efficacy is important for successful self-management and that this can be enhanced with support. The purpose of this study was to assess self-efficacy to manage problems in the year following primary treatment. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 219 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 80 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 18% |
| Psychology | 28 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 84 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2019.
All research outputs
#2,461,194
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#169
of 1,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,669
of 242,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,527 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.