↓ Skip to main content

Allergic Reactions to Anisakis Found in Fish

Overview of attention for article published in Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 847)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Allergic Reactions to Anisakis Found in Fish
Published in
Current Allergy and Asthma Reports, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11882-014-0455-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie E. Nieuwenhuizen, Andreas L. Lopata

Abstract

The food-borne parasite Anisakis is an important hidden food allergen. Anisakis is a parasitic nematode which has a third-stage larval form that infects mainly fish, and ingestion of contaminated seafood can result in severe allergic reactions. Symptoms experienced due to exposure to this parasite include gastrointestinal disorders, urticaria, dermatitis, asthma and even anaphylaxis. Accurate prevalence data of allergic sensitisation to Anisakis are difficult to estimate due to the lack of well-designed population-based studies. Current diagnostic approaches rely on the detection of serum IgE antibodies to allergenic proteins, which however demonstrate considerable immunological cross-reactivity to other invertebrate allergens. While exposure to this parasite seems to increase due to the increasing consumption of seafood worldwide, the immunology of infection and allergic sensitization is not fully understood.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 30 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 110. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2023.
All research outputs
#366,783
of 24,698,221 outputs
Outputs from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#20
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,219
of 233,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Allergy and Asthma Reports
#2
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,698,221 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.