You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Imperfect pathogen detection from non‐invasive skin swabs biases disease inference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, September 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12868 |
| Authors |
Graziella V. DiRenzo, Evan H. Campbell Grant, Ana V. Longo, Christian Che‐Castaldo, Kelly R. Zamudio, Karen R. Lips |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 32% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 10% |
| Paraguay | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Trinidad and Tobago | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 58% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 25% |
| Researcher | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,602,677
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#691
of 2,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,676
of 326,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#23
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.