| Title |
The lively ethics of global health GMOs: The case of the Oxitec mosquito
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioSocieties, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1057/biosoc.2014.16 |
| Authors |
Alex M Nading |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 22% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2015.
All research outputs
#2,082,177
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from BioSocieties
#72
of 421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,117
of 242,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioSocieties
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.