↓ Skip to main content

A comparison of serum antivenom concentrations after intravenous and intramuscular administration of redback (widow) spider antivenom

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A comparison of serum antivenom concentrations after intravenous and intramuscular administration of redback (widow) spider antivenom
Published in
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, August 2007
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.03004.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geoffrey K. Isbister, Margaret O'Leary, Mark Miller, Simon G. A. Brown, Sharmaine Ramasamy, Rosemary James, Jennifer S. Schneider

Abstract

There are no studies measuring antivenom concentrations following intramuscular administration. This study aimed to compare antivenom concentrations following intravenous and intramuscular administration of redback spider antivenom (RBSAV).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 6%
Colombia 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 28 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 6 19%
Researcher 6 19%
Other 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 7 22%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 6 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#2,136
of 5,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,484
of 76,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#20
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.